Where Was Moab? by Brian C. Jones

Bible atlases sometimes print a question mark after the names of cities whose location is uncertain, but they never do this with countries. After all, how hard could it be to ascertain the location of a country? In at least one case—Moab—it is more difficult than you might think. 

The area in question is bounded on the west by the Dead Sea, on the east by the Arabian desert, on the south by the deep canyon of the River Zered (modern Wadi Zarqa-Ma'in), and on the north by the nation of Ammon. Bisecting this area is a major east–west canyon through which flows the River Arnon (modern Wadi Mujib).

In Bible atlases, historical maps depicting the premonarchic period label the area north of the Arnon Reuben and the area to its south Moab. In depictions of the period after the rise of the Israelite monarchy, atlases show Moab stretching across the area both north and south of the Arnon, suggesting that Moab expanded northward during the monarchic period. Bible dictionaries typically refer to the southern plateau as “Moab’s heartland” or “Moab proper.” But evidence from the Bible and a Moabite inscription call into question this widely accepted picture.

First, Numbers, Deuteronomy, and Joshua all refer to the Jordan valley north of the Dead Sea as the “Plains of Moab,” presumably because it was a part of Moab. The Balaam story in Num 22-24 also mentions Moab’s control of this area. Num 32 and Josh 13 state that the tribes of Reuben and Gad settled in the area north of the Arnon, but the tale in Judg 3 asserts that Moab at least occasionally controlled the northern plateau and the southern Jordan valley—including Jericho!—even after the conquest. The texts that give evidence of who controlled the area north of the Arnon abound with conflicts, probably reflecting competing territorial claims. Curiously, the Bible never states that Moab’s control extended south of the Arnon, as is commonly supposed.

Second, an oracle against Moab in Isa 15-16 lists over 15 Moabite cities, and every one that can be identified lies north of the Arnon, with one possible exception: Kir Hareseth, a city long associated with Kerak, the site of a Crusader castle south of the Arnon. Identifying Kir Hareseth with Kerak is the cornerstone of the view that Moab “proper” lies south of the Arnon. But several scholars have argued that this identification is mistaken, and their conclusion is increasingly accepted among scholars. This removes the key evidence for placing Moab’s heartland south of the Arnon.

Third, a Moabite inscription written about 850 B.C.E. celebrates King Mesha’s conquest, expansion, or fortification of 17 cities, and all those that can be identified lie north of the Arnon, including Mesha’s capital city, Dibon. The inscription gives no evidence of Moabite control south of the Arnon.

In short, evidence both within and outside the Bible indicates that Moab’s heartland lay north, not south, of the Arnon. Perhaps Bible atlases will someday reflect this.

Brian C. Jones, "Where Was Moab?", n.p. [cited 13 Dec 2017]. Online: http://bibleodyssey.org/en/places/related-articles/where-was-moab

Contributors

Brian Jones

Brian C. Jones
Professor, Wartburg College

Brian C. Jones is a professor of religion at Wartburg College in Waverly, Iowa, where he teaches courses in Bible, theology, and science and religion. His published works include books and essays on Isaiah, Wisdom Literature, and historical geography.

Relating to or associated with people living in the territory of the northern kingdom of Israel during the divided monarchy, or more broadly describing the biblical descendants of Jacob.

A system of rule with a monarch as its head; or the hereditary system passed from one monarch to another.

Num 22-24

* Invalid citation format *

Num 32

* Invalid citation format *

Josh 13

* Invalid citation format *

Judg 3

* Invalid citation format *

Isa 15-16

* Invalid citation format *

 NEH Logo
Bible Odyssey has been made possible in part by the National Endowment for the Humanities: Exploring the human endeavor
Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this website, do not necessarily represent those of the National Endowment for the Humanities.